Dawn Prosser v. National Rural Utilities Coope

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Dawn Prosser v. National Rural Utilities Coope

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

__________

No. 13-2076 __________

In re: National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation, et al., Debtors

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation; Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative; Steven L. Lilly; John J. List; Sheldon C. Petersen; R. Wayne Stratton; Fulbright & Jaworski LLP; Greenlight Capital, Inc.; Greenlight Capital L.P.; Greenlight Capital Qualified LP; Greenlight Capital Offshore Ltd.

v.

Jeffrey J. Prosser; Dawn Prosser; Adrian Prosser; John P. Raynor (Bankr. D. Del. No. 09-ap-52854)

Jeffrey J. Prosser; Dawn Prosser; Adrian Prosser; John P. Raynor

v.

National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corporation; Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative; National Rural Electric Cooperative Association; Sheldon C. Petersen; John J. List; Steven L. Lilly; R. Wayne Stratton; Greenlight Capital, Inc.; Greenlight Capital Qualified LP; Greenlight Capital Offshore Ltd.; Fulbright & Jaworski LLP; Glenn L. English; Deloitte Touche USA LLP; Ernst & Young LLP (Bankr. D. Del. No. 10-ap-50744)

Jeffrey J. Prosser; Dawn Prosser; Adrian Prosser; John P. Raynor, Appellants

__________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (D.C. Nos. 1-12-cv-00155 and 1-12-cv-00156) District Judge: Honorable Sue L. Robinson Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 20, 2014

BEFORE: McKEE, Chief Judge, CHAGARES, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

_______________

JUDGMENT ORDER _______________

This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and was submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on May 20, 2014.

After considering the District Court’s referral to the Bankruptcy Court (In re Allegheny Health Educ. and Research Foundation,

383 F.3d 169, 175

(3d Cir. 2004)), and other contentions raised by the Appellants, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that, essentially for the reasons stated in the District Court’s memorandum order entered on March 21, 2013, the same is hereby AFFIRMED.

Costs are taxed against appellants.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard L. Nygaard Circuit Judge

ATTEST:

s/Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Dated: October 21, 2014

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished