Andrew Carman v. Jeremy Carroll
Andrew Carman v. Jeremy Carroll
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________
No. 13-2371 _____________
ANDREW CARMAN and KAREN CARMAN,
Appellants
v.
JEREMY CARROLL
_____________
On Appeal From the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (No. 3:10-cv-01013) District Judge: Honorable James M. Munley _____________
Submitted on December 12, 2014 After Remand by the Supreme Court of the United States
Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, FUENTES, Circuit Judge, and SCHILLER, District Judge.1
____________
JUDGMENT ORDER ____________
This cause came to be heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Pennsylvania and upon remand from the Supreme Court of the United
States
1 Honorable Berle M. Schiller, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.
1 it is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court denying
Appellants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the unlawful entry claim and the
jury verdict regarding the Appellants' unlawful seizure claim be and hereby are
AFFIRMED.
By the Court,
s/ Julio M. Fuentes Circuit Judge
ATTEST:
s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk
Dated: December 18, 2014
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished