Born Rush v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Born Rush v., 622 F. App'x 187 (3d Cir. 2015)

Born Rush v.

Opinion

OPINION *

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Born Rush filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct the District Court to rule upon his then-pending petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Soon thereafter, the District Court disposed of Rush’s § 2241 petition, dismissing it in part and denying it in part. Because the District Court granted Rush the relief he requested in his mandamus petition — a decision on his § 2241 petition — his mandamus petition has been rendered moot. See, e.g., Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we will dismiss Rush’s mandamus petition.

*

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Reference

Full Case Name
In Re Born Islam RUSH, Petitioner
Status
Unpublished