United States v. Maurice Phillips
United States v. Maurice Phillips
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS THIRD CIRCUIT _____________
No. 13-3592 _____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MAURICE PHILLIPS, Appellant _____________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Crim. No. 2-07-cr-00549-001) District Judge: Hon. J. Curtis Joyner _____________
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1 (a) (July 22, 2014) ______________
BEFORE: McKEE, Chief Judge, CHAGARES, Circuit Judge, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
______________
JUDGMENT ORDER ______________
After considering the contentions raised by appellant, to-wit, that the District
Court erred abused its discretion in denying Appellant’s emergency motion to stay
enforcement of the court’s preliminary order of forfeiture for substitute asset.
The Honorable Anne E. Thompson, Senior District Judge of New Jersey, sitting by designation. On consideration whereof and in light of our disposition of United States v.
Phillips,
589 F. App’x 64(3d Cir. 2014) cert. denied,
135 S. Ct. 2911(2015), it is now
here ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of the said District
Court entered July 25, 2013, be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
By the Court,
s/Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge
Attest:
s/Marcia M. Waldron Clerk
Dated: January 26, 2016
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished