Shaun Rosiere v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Shaun Rosiere v., 690 F. App'x 93 (3d Cir. 2017)

Shaun Rosiere v.

Opinion

OPINION *

PER CURIAM

Shaun Rosiere seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on three motions pending in the underlying criminal matter concerning the terms of his supervised release. By order entered April 5, 2017, the District Court denied each motion. In light of the District Court’s action, this mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiffs personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).

*

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Reference

Full Case Name
In RE: Shaun ROSIERE, Petitioner
Status
Unpublished