DLD-231 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________

No. 18-2104 ___________

IN RE: EVARISTO SERRANO VARGAS, Petitioner ____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3-17-cv-00801) ____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. June 7, 2018 Before: JORDAN, SHWARTZ and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 12, 2018) _________

OPINION* _________

PER CURIAM

Evaristo Serrano Vargas filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we

direct the District Court to rule on a petition that he had filed pursuant to

. The District Court has since ruled on Serrano Vargas’s § 2241 petition. In light of

the District Court’s action, the question Serrano Vargas presented is no longer a live

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. controversy, so we will dismiss his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v.

Xerox Corp.,

(3d Cir. 1992).

2