Joseph Aruanno v.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Joseph Aruanno v.

Opinion

HLD-007 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________

No. 20-1660 ___________

IN RE: JOSEPH ARUANNO, Petitioner ____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2-15-cv-07982) ____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. May 21, 2020 Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 10, 2020) _________

OPINION* _________

PER CURIAM

Joseph Aruanno petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the District Court to

rule on his Third Amended Complaint. After Aruanno filed this petition, the District

Court dismissed that complaint by order entered June 2, 2020. Thus, because Aruanno

has received all the relief he requested, his petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that

basis. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.,

77 F.3d 690, 698-99

(3d Cir. 1996).

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Reference

Status
Unpublished