HLD-004 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________

No. 21-1096 ___________

IN RE: IFEDOO NOBLE ENIGWE, Petitioner ____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:19-cv-12631) ____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. February 25, 2021

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, CHAGARES and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: March 12, 2021) _________

OPINION* _________

PER CURIAM

Ifedoo Enigwe filed in the District Court a motion for relief from judgment under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Before this Court is a petition for a writ of mandamus in which

Enigwe requests that we compel the District Court to act on his Rule 60(b) motion.

Because the District Court has since ruled on the Rule 60(b) motion, Enigwe’s mandamus

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. petition will be dismissed as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.,

(3d Cir. 1996).

2