HLD-004 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 21-1096 ___________ IN RE: IFEDOO NOBLE ENIGWE, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:19-cv-12631) ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. February 25, 2021 Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, CHAGARES and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: March 12, 2021) _________ OPINION* _________ PER CURIAM Ifedoo Enigwe filed in the District Court a motion for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Before this Court is a petition for a writ of mandamus in which Enigwe requests that we compel the District Court to act on his Rule 60(b) motion.

Because the District Court has since ruled on the Rule 60(b) motion, Enigwe’s mandamus

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. petition will be dismissed as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 699-700 (3d Cir. 1996).