United States v. James Hill
United States v. James Hill
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________
No. 19-2532 ______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JAMES HILL, Appellant ______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2-18-cr-00458-001) District Judge: Honorable Gerald A. McHugh ______________
Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 15, 2020 ______________
Before: AMBRO, JORDAN, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. ______________
JUDGMENT ORDER ______________
After considering the contentions raised by appellant, to-wit, that the court erred in
entering his conviction because the indictment did not allege, the jury was not instructed,
and the evidence offered did not prove that he knew he was a felon at the time he
possessed a firearm, and as none of these objections were preserved, and even if there
were an indictment error, it is not plain error that requires disturbing the judgment
because appellant cannot demonstrate prejudice, United States v. Greer,
141 S. Ct. 2090, 2097-98(2021) (concluding defendant could not demonstrate prejudice under plain-error
review because “[i]f a person is a felon, he ordinarily knows he is a felon,” particularly
where he “stipulated to the fact that he was a felon”), it is
ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be and is
hereby affirmed.
BY THE COURT,
s/Patty Shwartz Circuit Judge
ATTEST:
s/Patricia S. Dodszuweit Clerk
Dated: July 30, 2021
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished