NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________

No. 22-1847 _______________

JAMES STEUERT, Appellant v.

L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION _______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 1:11-cv-03385) District Judge: Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez _______________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on January 26, 2023

Before: BIBAS, NYGAARD, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

(Filed: January 26, 2023) _______________

OPINION * _______________

BIBAS, Circuit Judge.

James Steuert appeals the dismissal of his complaint. But because the District Court

never issued a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction to review that dismissal.

. The District Court gave Steuert twenty days to file an amended complaint but did

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding precedent. not “provide[ ] express notice” that its order would “automatically produce a final order of

dismissal when the time to amend [ran] out.” Weber v. McGrogan,

(3d

Cir. 2019). And though Steuert filed a notice of appeal after those twenty days, he did not

clearly stand on his complaint. See

So we will dismiss his appeal.

2