NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-1847 _______________ JAMES STEUERT, Appellant v. L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 1:11-cv-03385) District Judge: Honorable Joseph H. Rodriguez _______________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on January 26, 2023 Before: BIBAS, NYGAARD, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Filed: January 26, 2023) _______________ OPINION * _______________ BIBAS, Circuit Judge.

James Steuert appeals the dismissal of his complaint. But because the District Court never issued a final judgment, we lack jurisdiction to review that dismissal. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The District Court gave Steuert twenty days to file an amended complaint but did

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding precedent. not “provide[ ] express notice” that its order would “automatically produce a final order of dismissal when the time to amend [ran] out.” Weber v. McGrogan, 939 F.3d 232, 240 (3d Cir. 2019). And though Steuert filed a notice of appeal after those twenty days, he did not clearly stand on his complaint. See id. So we will dismiss his appeal.