NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________

No. 22-2866 ___________

AARON J. BRESSI, Appellant

v.

JOHN GEMBIC; MICHAEL TOOMEY; PETER KAY; and VINNY CLAUSI ____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 4:17-cv-01405) District Judge: Honorable Matthew W. Brann ____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 23, 2023 Before: JORDAN, CHUNG, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: May 24, 2023) ___________

OPINION * ___________

PER CURIAM

Proceeding pro se, Aaron Bressi filed a federal civil rights action against his

former employer and three participants in his prior criminal cases. The District Court

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. dismissed Bressi’s action under

(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). We

affirmed. See Bressi v. Gembic,

, 115 (3d Cir. 2019) (per curiam).

Years later, Bressi filed motions in the District Court requesting permission to “refile” his

case. In denying the latest of the motions, the District Court determined that Bressi had

“failed to establish any basis to reopen this case.” Bressi now appeals that ruling. We

have appellate jurisdiction under

, and, agreeing with the District Court

that Bressi’s motion to “refile” was baseless, we will affirm the judgment below.

2