United States v. Jamal Eberhardt
United States v. Jamal Eberhardt
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________
No. 22-2804 _____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JAMAL EBERHARDT, Appellant _______________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (No. 2-21-cr-00393-001) U.S. District Judge: Honorable Gerald A. McHugh _______________
Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) December 4, 2023 _____________
Before: SHWARTZ, CHUNG, and McKEE, Circuit Judges. _____________
JUDGMENT ORDER _____________
This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted pursuant to Third
Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on December 4, 2023.
The Appellant challenged his sentence on appeal. The Court has determined that
the sentence imposed is both procedurally and substantively reasonable. United States v. Tomko,
562 F.3d 558, 566(3d Cir. 2009) (en banc); see also Rita v. United States,
551 U.S. 338, 347(2007) (a guideline sentence is presumptively reasonable); United States v.
Gunter,
462 F.3d 237, 247(3d Cir. 2006) (elements of procedural reasonableness
analysis).
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the
District Court entered on September 23, 2022 is hereby AFFIRMED.
By the Court,
s/ Patty Shwartz Circuit Judge
ATTEST:
s/Patricia S. Dodszuweit Clerk
Dated: December 5, 2023
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished