Keystone Coal Mining Corp v. Director Office of Workers Compensation Programs U

NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 23-1481 _____________

KEYSTONE COAL MINING CORPORATION; CONSOL ENERGY, INCORPORATED,

Petitioners v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; MICHAEL W. CHONCEK

_____________

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

(Agency Case No. 22-00153 BLA)

Administrative Law Judge: Drew A. Swank _____________ Argued April 3, 2024

Before: RESTREPO, MATEY and McKEE, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: April 24, 2024) _____________

Christopher L. Wildfire [ARGUED] Toni Williams Sutter Williams 850 Ridge Avenue Suite 300 Pittsburgh, PA 15212

Counsel for Petitioners Haley L. Carter [ARGUED] Timothy C. MacDonnell [ARGUED] Washington & Lee University School of Law Room 106 1 E Denny Circle Lexington, VA 24450

Counsel for Respondent

_____________ OPINION * _____________

MATEY, Circuit Judge.

Keystone Coal Mining Corporation and Consol Energy, Incorporated (together, “Keystone”) petition for review of an order from the United States Department of Labor Benefits Review Board (“Board”) affirming the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to award disability benefits to Michael Choncek. Because the determination is supported by substantial evidence and complies with applicable law, we will deny the petition for review. 1

I.

Michael Choncek worked as an underground coal miner for over 20 years. In 2018, he filed a claim for benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C § 901 et seq., for coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (“CWP”), or black lung disease. Responding, the District Director of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs issued a proposed decision and order awarding benefits. Keystone requested a formal hearing, and an ALJ confirmed the award. Following a remand by the Board, 2 the ALJ again found that Choncek was totally disabled and again confirmed the benefits award. The Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision, and Keystone now brings this petition for review. 3

II.

To qualify for CWP benefits, a claimant must prove that he has pneumoconiosis from coal mine employment causing a totally disabling respiratory impairment. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 718.202–204. The claimant can invoke a rebuttable presumption of total disability caused by pneumoconiosis if he worked in underground coal mines for at least fifteen years, submitted a compliant chest X-ray that was negative for complicated pneumoconiosis, and “other evidence demonstrates the existence of a totally disabling respiratory or pulmonary impairment . . . .” App. 24; 30 U.S.C. § 921(c)(4). A totally disabling respiratory or pulmonary impairment prevents a claimant from performing his “usual coal mine work” or comparable employment. 20 C.F.R. § 718.204(b)(1).

A.

A claimant may prove total disability by submitting evidence that his pulmonary function tests or arterial blood-gas tests yield qualifying values under the Department of Labor’s regulations, or that he has been diagnosed with pneumoconiosis and cor pulmonale (pulmonary heart disease) with right-sided congestive heart failure. See 20 C.F.R. § 718.204(b)(2)(i–iii). Even absent such evidence, however, total disability can also be found “if a physician exercising reasoned medical judgment, based on medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques, concludes that a miner’s respiratory or pulmonary condition” qualified the worker as totally disabled. 20 C.F.R. § 718.204(b)(2)(iv).

Here, the ALJ found Choncek totally disabled based on the opinions of three of the five medical experts offered and concluded that Choncek would be unable to perform his usual work as a coal miner or something comparable. Keystone disagrees with the “reasoned medical judgment” of these physicians on whom the ALJ relied. 20 C.F.R. § 718.204(b)(2)(iv). But we decline to reweigh this evidence. See Rutherford v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 546, 552 (3d Cir. 2005) (“In the process of reviewing the record for substantial evidence, we may not weigh the evidence or substitute our own conclusions for those of the fact-finder.”) (cleaned up).

B.

Nor do we see error in the ALJ’s conclusion that “after considering all of the evidence together,” App. 33, Keystone could not show Choncek had neither clinical nor legal pneumoconiosis. 4 Again, Keystone contests the ALJ’s evidentiary analysis, but disagreement does not make the ALJ’s decision irrational or unsupported. And Keystone did not demonstrate that “no part of [Choncek’s] respiratory or pulmonary total disability was caused by pneumoconiosis.” 20 C.F.R. § 718.305(d)(1)(ii). Three of the medical experts consulted by the ALJ attributed at least part of Choncek’s total pulmonary disability to pneumoconiosis, while Keystone’s two medical experts “did not offer an explanation” as to whether “pneumoconiosis caused [Choncek’s] total respiratory disability.” App. 12 n.10. The ALJ’s decision to pick which evidence to credit, and which to decline, is a discretionary function we will not disturb. See Rutherford, 399 F.3d at 552.

***

For these reasons, we will deny the petition for review. and its sequelae arising out of coal mine employment,” 20 C.F.R. § 718.201(a)(2), or that is “significantly related to, or substantially aggravated by, dust exposure in coal mine employment,” 20 C.F.R. § 718.201(b).