NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _________________ No. 24-2319 _________________ EHI ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ________________ On Appeal from the District Court of the Virgin Islands (D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00044) Circuit Judge: Honorable Cheryl Ann Krause* ________________ Argued May 2, 2025 Before: RESTREPO, FREEMAN, and McKEE, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: May 20, 2025) ______________ OPINION** ______________

*The Honorable Cheryl Ann Krause, Circuit Judge sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 291(b). **This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Julien A. Adams [ARGUED] Gregory S. Dovel Dovel & Luner Santa Monica Boulevard Suite 600 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Craig M. O’Shea Dudley Newman & Feuerzeig 1000 Frederiksberg Gade P.O. Box 756 St. Thomas, VI 00802 Counsel for Appellant Adam Sleeper [ARGUED] Aysha Gregory Office of United States Attorney 5500 Veterans Drive United States Courthouse, Suite 260 St. Thomas, VI 00802 Counsel for Appellee McKEE, Circuit Judge.

EHI Acquisitions, LLC appeals the District Court’s grant of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

In her well-reasoned and thorough opinion, Judge Krause explained why EHI is not entitled to relief and why the Defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.1 As Judge Krause detailed, even if the relevant indenture is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence makes the result clear. We can add little to Judge Krause’s analysis and discussion, and we will therefore affirm the District Court’s order substantially for the reasons set forth in that opinion.

EHI Acquisitions, LLC v. United States, No. 3:22-CV-00044, 2024 WL 1717090, at *8– (D.V.I. Apr. 22, 2024) (caption misspelled in the opinion).