U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 2025

Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc

Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Decided May 20, 2025

Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1774 ____________ RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Appellant v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC; DOW INC; CORTEVA INC; INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES; AVANTOR INC; LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC; VANGUARD GROUP INC; WILLIAM PENN FOUNDATION; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; BALLARD SPAHR LLP; GELLERT SCALI BUSENKELL & BROWN LLC; EDWARD BREEN; ANDREW LIVERIS; RAJIV GUPTA; ANDREAS FIBIG; DAVID H. LONG; TIMOTHY BUCKLEY; JANET HAAS, MD; JAMES KENNEY; MARCEL S. PRATT, ESQUIRE; DIANA CORTES; MARISSA O’CONNELL, ESQUIRE; BRIAN R. CULLIN, ESQUIRE; GARY F. SEITZ, ESQUIRE; JOHN DOE NOS. 1-15 ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01868) District Judge: Honorable R. Barclay Surrick ____________ No. 24-1775 ____________ RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Appellant v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC; DOW INC; CORTEVA INC; INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES; AVANTOR INC; LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC; VANGUARD GROUP INC; WILLIAM PENN FOUNDATION; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; BALLARD SPAHR LLP; GELLERT SCALI BUSENKELL & BROWN LLC; OFFICE DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL EDWARD BREEN; ANDREW LIVERIS; RAJIV GUPTA; ANDREAS FIBIG; DAVID H. LONG; TIMOTHY BUCKLEY; JANET HAAS, MD; JAMES KENNEY; MARCEL S. PRATT, ESQUIRE; DIANA CORTES; MARISSA O’CONNELL, ESQUIRE; BRIAN R. CULLIN, ESQUIRE; GARY F. SEITZ, ESQUIRE; THOMAS J. FARRELL, ESQ., ESQUIRE; RICHARD HERNANDEZ, ESQUIRE; JOSHUA ROBERTS; DANIEL ANDERS; JOHN DOE NOS. 1-5 ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 2:24-cv-00924) District Judge: Honorable R. Barclay Surrick ____________ Before: MATEY, FREEMAN, and ROTH, Circuit Judges _______________ JUDGMENT ORDER _______________ Having considered the parties’ arguments about whether these appeals have been rendered moot, it is hereby ORDERED that these appeals are DISMISSED as moot. 1 Costs shall not be taxed.

By the Court,

s/Arianna J. Freeman Circuit Judge

Appellant’s Amended Motions for Summary Action, Sanctions, and Attorney Discipline are denied. All other motions in these appeals are denied as moot.

ATTEST:

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit Clerk Dated: May 20, 2025 cc: All Counsel of Record

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.