Eddy Alexandre v.

HLD-010 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 25-3557 ___________ IN RE: EDDY ALEXANDRE, Petitioner ____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 1:24-cv-02123) ____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. January 22, 2026 Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: March 3, 2026) _________ OPINION * _________ PER CURIAM Eddy Alexandre has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the District Court to rule on his habeas petition. After Alexandre filed his mandamus petition, the District Court ruled on his habeas petition by dismissing it on February 2, 2026. Thus, because Alexandre has received all the relief he requested, his

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that basis. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).