1911
32 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit opinions from 1911.
- Southern Ry. Co. v. United States 192 F. 1023, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Sturgiss v. Meurer 191 F. 1005, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Norfolk Southern R. v. Talbott 190 F. 737, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Norfolk & A. Terminal Co. v. Rotolo 191 F. 4, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Sturgiss v. Meurer 191 F. 9, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Fleming v. Laws 191 F. 283, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Graham v. United States 188 F. 651, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Baltimore & O. R. v. Thornton 188 F. 868, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Jackson v. White 188 F. 775, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Coffin v. Harris-Woodbury Lumber Co. 187 F. 1005, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Foster v. United States 188 F. 305, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Baker-Whiteley Coal Co. v. Baltimore & O. R. 188 F. 405, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Jennings v. Davis 187 F. 703, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Cumberland Gaslight Co. v. West Virginia & Maryland Gas Co. 188 F. 585, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Elkins Electric Ry. Co. v. Western Maryland Ry. Co. 186 F. 1022, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. Hawkins 187 F. 568, (4th Cir. 1911)
- The Old Point Comfort 187 F. 765, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. Rephan 188 F. 276, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp. 185 F. 109, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Dickinson v. Huntington 185 F. 703, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Whealton Packing Co. v. Ætna Ins. 185 F. 108, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Burroughs v. Toxaway Co. 185 F. 435, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Bank of Marion v. Norwood 184 F. 986, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Duff v. United States 185 F. 101, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Skipwith v. Albemarle Soapstone Co. 185 F. 15, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Williamson v. American Bane 185 F. 66, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Hamburg-American Steam Packet Co. v. Baker 185 F. 70, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Norwood Paper Co. v. Columbia Paper Bag Co. of Baltimore City 185 F. 454, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Henry Paper Co. v. Columbia Paper Bag Co. 185 F. 464, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Henderson v. Kanawha Dock Co. 185 F. 781, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Grantham 187 F. 52, (4th Cir. 1911)
- Southern Ry. Co. v. Mooresville Cotton Mills 187 F. 72, (4th Cir. 1911)