U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1914

Pineland Club v. Robert

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 27, 1914

213 F. 545; 130 C.C.A. 125; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1910

Counsel

Frank R. Frost, of Charleston, S. C., and Joseph S. Clark, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs in error., Benj. H. Rutledge, of Charleston, S. C., for defendants in error.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

After careful consideration of the elaborate ar-

gument of the plaintiff in error, we have no doubt that the two opinions of the District Judge, one on the original hearing and the other in denying the motion for a new trial, conclusively show that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the land in controversy; and we deem it unnecessary to restate the reasons.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.