U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1921

Senick v. United States

Senick v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 17, 1921
271 F. 918; 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1887

Counsel

R. T. Thorp and J. L. Broudy, both of Norfolk, Va., for plaintiff in error., Hiram M. Smith, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of Richmond, Va.

Senick v. United States

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In so far as the questions which the plaintiff in error seeks here to raise are of substance, they have been answered adversely to his contentions by our opinion in Pierriero v. United States, 271 Fed. 912, handed down at this term.

Affirmed-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.