U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1921

Woodall v. Estabrook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 1921 · Boyd, Icnapp, Woods

273 F. 152; 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 1434

Counsel

E. L. Hogsett, of Huntington, W. Va. (B. E. Wilkinson, of Hamlin, W. Va., on the.brief), for appellants., Cary N. Davis, of Huntington, W. Va. (W. C. W. Renshaw, of Huntington, W. Va., J. S. Clark and H. A. McCarthy, both of Philadelphia, Pa., and Vinson, Thompson, Meek & Renshaw and Fitzpatrick, Campbell, Brown & Davis, all of Huntington, W. Va., on the brief), for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Huntington Development & Gas Co. v. Stewart (4th Cir. 1930)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

These are suits in equity to have removed as a cloud on complainant’s title a paper described as a disclaimer. The instrument is the same in character as that we have considered and held to be in effect a quitclaim deed in the opinion just filed in the ejectment suit of Joseph D. Miller v. George L. Estabrook and others, 278 Fed. 144. AH the questions here made were involved in that case, and the decision in that case is conclusive of these.

The result is that the decrees of the District Court must be affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.