U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1924

Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.

Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 1924
2 F.2d 418; 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2063 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

W. B. Gruber and M. P. Howell, both of Walterboro, S. C. (Howell & Fishburne and J. C. Lemacks, all of Walterboro, S. C., on llie brief), for appellants., A. B. Lovett, of Savannah, Ga., and G. L. B. Rivers, of Charleston, S. C. (J. M. M'oorer, of Walterboro, S. C., Hitch, Denmark & Lovett, of Savannah, Ga., Padgett & Moor-er, of Walterboro, S. C., and Ilagood, Rivers & Young, of Charleston, S. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Gruber v. Savannah River Lumber Co.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are not prepared to assent to the construction placed by the District Judge on tho decision of tho Supreme Court of South Carolina in Richardson v. Cooler, 115 S. C. 102, 104 S. E. 305. On that point it is not necessary to express an opinion. We adopt the reasoning of the District Judge on which he reaches the conclusion that Mr. Gruber is estopped, and on that ground affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.