Noirmot v. Rosemary

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Noirmot v. Rosemary, 9 F.2d 982 (4th Cir. 1925)
1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2498

Noirmot v. Rosemary

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the testimony and the oral and printed arguments. We are satisfied that the amount awarded by the deeree helow to the libelant Noirmot is ample to cover all claims he has against the respondents or either of them. We are not prepared to say it is excessive. We believe that the learned court below was right in holding that the other libelants had failed to establish any ground for recovery.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
William NOIRMOT, J. Olsen, Peder Hansen, J. Windehl and M. Derrane, and v. Schooner ROSEMARY, Charles J. Denechand, Owner, and W. N. Burbidge, Master, and
Status
Published