U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1943

National Labor Relations Board v. Jac. Feinberg Hosiery Mill, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 14, 1943 · Dobie, Parker, Soper

134 F.2d 620; 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 3652; 6 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 61,543 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Colonel C. Sawyer, Sr. Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D. C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David Findling and William T. Whitsett, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner., Frank Buckley, of Washington, D. C. (Buckley & Danzansky and Joseph B. Danzansky, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (Supreme Court of the United States 1945)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which is resisted on the ground that the Board’s findings are not supported by substantial evidence. The questions involved are pure questions of fact and no useful purpose would be served by an analysis of the evidence which was fully arrayed and appraised by the Board in its decision and order. 1942, 38 N.L.R.B. 1359. We think that the findings were amply supported and that the order should be enforced. Complaint is made of the order in that it runs against the successors and assigns of respondent, as well as against its officers and agents, but there is nothing to show that this was not proper in the premises.

Order enforced.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.