U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1955

Percy William Herman v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 9, 1955 · Parker, Do-Bie, Barksdale

227 F.2d 332 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Percy William Herman, pro se., James R. Moore, First Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va. (L. S. Parsons, Jr., U. S. Atty., Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

Maynor v. USA 2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
Smith v. USA 2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2024)
Clemons v. USA-2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2024)
Alexander v. USA-2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2023)
Yelizarer v. USA-2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2021)
Atkinson v. USA - 2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2021)
Gill v. USA - 2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2020)
Sammons v. USA - 2255 (District Court, D. Maryland 2020)
Haynes v. United States (District Court, D. Maryland 2006)
Herbert W. Boeckenhaupt v. United States (4th Cir. 1976)
Azzone v. United States (D. Minn. 1961)
Lupino v. United States (D. Minn. 1960)
United States v. Robert G. Thompson (2d Cir. 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate and set aside the judgment and sentence of the court below affirmed by this court in Herman v. United States, 4 Cir., 220 F.2d 219. The motion raised no questions which were not fully considered on the appeal from the judgment and sentence. Furthermore, the grounds of the motion were matters which could have been presented only by appeal and not by motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.