United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright
United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright
316 F.2d 188; 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5715
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright
Opinion
This is a prosecution for violation of the liquor laws. An examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence furnished a sufficient basis for the jury’s finding of guilt as to each of the defendants. Objections to the evidence are without merit, and we find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.