Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as...
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as...
Opinion
324 F.2d 954
HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
S. S.BAY BELLE, Appellee.
James McCONNELL, trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and
Carmen Santonello, trading as Santell Linen
Service, Appellants,
v.
STEAM SHIP JOHN A. MESECK, Appellee.
Nos. 9137, 9138.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Nov. 20, 1963.
Decided Dec. 2, 1963.
Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Wahl & Wahl, Solomon B. Levin, Baltimore, Md., and Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, Jersey City, N.J., on brief), for appellants.
Samuel D. Slade, Philadelphia, Pa. (David H. Rosenbluth, Gilbert W. Oswald, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., and Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on brief), for appellees.
Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and BARKSDALE, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in its opinion filed herein, 215 F.Supp. 72 (1963), the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck
- Status
- Published