Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1967

Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 6, 1967 · Haynsworth, Bryan, Bell
370 F.2d 568; 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 407 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Stanley Worth, Washington, D. C. (Scott P. Crampton, Joseph A. McMenamin and Korner, Doyle, Worth & Crampton, Washington, D. C., on brief), for petitioners., Lawrence B. Silver, Attorney, Department of Justice (Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Fred R. Becker, Attorneys, Department of Justice, on brief), for respondent.

Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court finding that certain sales of real estate made by the husband were sales of capital assets, while other sales of real estate or of contractual interests in real estate, were of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of Murray’s business.

For the reasons stated by the Tax Court, 1 we deny the petition. Judge Kern’s opinion is entirely consistent with the subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Malat v. Riddell, 383 U.S. 569, 86 S.Ct. 1030, 16 L.Ed.2d 102. Nothing in Malat requires a modification of the result in the Tax Court.

Affirmed.

1

. Jerome S. Murray and Grace H. Murray v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Memo. 1965-148.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.