U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1967

Hammerman, II v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Association

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 10, 1967

385 F.2d 835 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Turner v. Lee (In re Minton Group, Inc.) (District Court, S.D. New York 1985)
Jordan v. Randolph Mills, Inc. (District Court, M.D. North Carolina 1983)
Evans v. Galardi (Cal. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

385 F.2d 835

I. H. HAMMERMAN, II, Trustee of Panitz & Co., Inc., F. G.
Enterprises, Inc., Joppa Farms, Inc., and P. & R.
Service and Supply, Inc., Debtors, Appellant,
v.
ARLINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 11663.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 6, 1967.
Decided Nov. 10, 1967.

Fenton L. Martin, Baltimore, Md. (Frederick J. Singley, Jr., and Hinkley & Singley, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellant.

David F. Albright, Baltimore, Md. (Bradley T. J. Mettee, Jr., and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, MARVIN JONES,* Senior Judge, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

While we think the District Court had jurisdiction to inquire into the matter, particularly to determine the bona fides of the partnership in which the bankrupt was a limited partner, we agree, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, filed on July 6, 1967,1 that the bankrupt's interest as a limited partner gave the bankruptcy court no power to administer real estate owned by the partnership or to enjoin its sale under foreclosure by the mortgagee.

Affirmed.

Sitting by designation

In re Panitz & Co., D.Md., 270 F.Supp. 448

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.