U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1967

Hammerman v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 10, 1967

385 F.2d 835 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Fenton L. Martin, Baltimore, Md. (Frederick J. Singley, Jr., and Hinkley & Singley, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellant., David F. Albright, Baltimore, Md. (Bradley T. J. Mettee, Jr., and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Sheppard v. Bay Country Realty, Inc. (Md. 1983)
Klein v. Weiss (Md. 1978)
Hawaiian Investors v. Thorndal (8th Cir. 1969)
Hammerman, II v. Arlington Federal Savings & Loan Association (4th Cir. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

While we think the District Court had jurisdiction to inquire into the matter, particularly to determine the bona fides of the partnership in which the bankrupt was a limited partner, we agree, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, filed on July 6, 1967,1 that the bankrupt’s interest as a limited partner gave the bankruptcy court no power to administer real estate owned by the partnership or to enjoin its sale under foreclosure by the mortgagee.

Affirmed.

. In re Panitz & Co., D.Md., 270 F.Supp. 448.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.