Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital, 398 F.2d 226 (4th Cir. 1968)
Boreman, Bryan, Craven, Per Curiam

Cecil B. Sanner and Mary W. Sanner v. The Trustees of the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Except for an important statutory relaxation 1 in 1966, Maryland judicially adheres to the so called doctrine of charitable immunity. Ordinarily such a matter is one of state law. Erie R. R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). We have carefully considered plaintiff’s interesting contention that the state of Maryland may not constitutionally cling to this judge-made, and increasingly questioned, doctrine. We reject the contention and affirm the granting of summary judgment in favor of the charitable institution, D.C., 278 F.Supp. 138.

Affirmed.

1

. Maryland Code Annotated Art. 43 §, 556A (Supp. 1966).

Reference

Full Case Name
Cecil B. SANNER and Mary W. Sanner, Appellants, v. the TRUSTEES OF the SHEPPARD AND ENOCH PRATT HOSPITAL, Appellee
Cited By
11 cases
Status
Published
↑