Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co.
Opinion of the Court
Counsel for appellees helpfully concede that the questions presented on these appeals are the same as those presented and decided in No. 12,154, Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line R. Company, and 12,155, Walker v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., 405 F.2d 645 (4th Cir. 1968). We adhere to our former decision. See: Chaote v. Caterpillar Tractor Company (7th Cir. October 17, 1968), 402 F.2d 357.
Reversed.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting):
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion filed in No. 12,154, Ray Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, and 12,155, Charles W. Walker v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., 405 F.2d 645, (4 Cir. 1968), I respectfully dissent.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Marvin W. BROWN v. GASTON COUNTY DYEING MACHINE COMPANY, a North Carolina Corporation, Appellee Daniel LEE v. The OBSERVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published