Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co., 405 F.2d 887 (4th Cir. 1968)
70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3065
Boreman, Cases, Craven, Johnson, Reasons, Sobeloff, Stated

Brown v. Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Counsel for appellees helpfully concede that the questions presented on these appeals are the same as those presented and decided in No. 12,154, Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line R. Company, and 12,155, Walker v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., 405 F.2d 645 (4th Cir. 1968). We adhere to our former decision. See: Chaote v. Caterpillar Tractor Company (7th Cir. October 17, 1968), 402 F.2d 357.

Reversed.

Judge BOREMAN dissents for the reasons to be stated in a dissenting opinion to be filed in the Johnson and Walker cases.

Dissenting Opinion

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge

(dissenting):

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion filed in No. 12,154, Ray Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company, and 12,155, Charles W. Walker v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., 405 F.2d 645, (4 Cir. 1968), I respectfully dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
Marvin W. BROWN v. GASTON COUNTY DYEING MACHINE COMPANY, a North Carolina Corporation, Appellee Daniel LEE v. The OBSERVER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a corporation
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published