John R. W. Sterling v. Leroy J. Blackwelder
Opinion
John R. W. Sterling appeals from an order of the district court directing the return of a $50,000.00 deposit which had been made by Wallace F. Holladay pursuant to his agreement to purchase a certain parcel of real property (known as the Moorefield Farms in Fairfax, Virginia) “ * * * free and clear of all encumbrances * * Upon examination of the title to said real estate it was discovered that the property involved was servient to nine recorded easements. 1
The district court held that these easements constituted encumbrances on the property, and consequently: the undertakings of the above-mentioned agreement could not be complied with in that the purchase could not be accomplished free and clear of all encumbrances; the prospective purchaser, Holladay, was entitled to rescind the agreement to purchase; and he was entitled to a refund of his deposit.
We affirm the holding of the district court for the reasons stated in its opinion. 2
Affirmed.
. These easements were held by the Commonwealth of Virginia in connection with public highways and by various public utilities.
. Sterling v. Blackwelder, Mem. Order, 302 F.Supp. 1125 (E.D.Va. 1969).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- John R. W. STERLING, Appellant, v. Leroy J. BLACKWELDER Et Al., Appellees
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published