Fred H. Carter v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Frank Aubeuf v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services (2d Cir. 1981)
- Bryan v. United States Secretary of Health & Human Services (District Court, E.D. North Carolina 1990)
- Leyva v. Harris (District Court, S.D. New York 1981)
- Holguin v. Harris (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1979)
- Pisarcik v. Weinberger (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1973)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The Social Security benefit claim now pressed was presented to us previously in Carter v. Celebrezze, 367 F.2d 382 (4 Cir., 1966). The District Court’s denial of Fred H. Carter’s suit was vacated and remanded for reconsideration because of subsequent amendments to Sections 216 (i) and 223 of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 416(i) (1) (A) and 423(c) (2) (A) (Supp. 1965). On its return to him the District Judge adjudicated the cause under these changes in the law. He again sustained the Secretary’s refusal of benefits to Carter as having substantial support in the evidence. Carter v. Finch, 308 F.Supp. 954 (SDW.Va. 1969).
On reexamination of the record we cannot say the District Judge was in error, and on his opinion we affirm.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.