United States v. Howard Ernest James
United States v. Howard Ernest James
426 F.2d 299; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9219
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States v. Howard Ernest James
Opinion
Howard Ernest James appeals his conviction for interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Upon our consideration of the briefs and the record, we find ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. Oral argument is unnecessary, and we grant the United States’ motion for summary affirmance.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.