Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation
Opinion
Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C. 1969), its judgment is
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees, v. PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published