U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1970

Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 1970 · Sobeloff, Boreman, Butzner

427 F.2d 144; 166 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 454; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8816 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert W. Fiddler, New York City (J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N. C., on brief) for appellant., Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Hunt, Heard & Rhodes, Greensboro, N. C., on brief) for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Whitehall Corp. v. Western Geophysical Co. of America (District Court, S.D. Texas 1986)
Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Sterner Lighting, Inc. v. Allied Electrical Supply, Inc. (5th Cir. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant’s patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge’s findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 303 F.Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C. 1969), its judgment is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.