U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1970

Eerik Heine v. Juri Raus

Eerik Heine v. Juri Raus
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 30, 1970 · Haynsworth, Winter, Craven
432 F.2d 1007; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6688 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert J. Stanford and Ernest C. Raskauskas, Washington, D. C., for appellant., Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D. C. (J. Alan Galbraith, and Williams & Connolly, E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., and Hogan & Hartson, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Eerik Heine v. Juri Raus

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On remand the district court fairly resolved the question of authority and ratification left open by our prior decision, Heine v. Raus, 399 F.2d 785 (4th Cir. *1008 1968). Thereupon he entered summary-judgment in accordance with the law of the case.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.