Appellant Wood was sentenced by a South Carolina state court to concurrent terms of five years’ imprisonment on his pleas' of guilty to two counts of making obscene telephone calls in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 16-552.1 (Supp. 1971).

The only issue presented us on this appeal from the district court’s denial of habeas corpus relief is whether the sentences imposed upon Wood are so excessive and disproportionate as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the eighth amendment.

The sentences given Wood were within the rather startling ten-year maximum allowed by South Carolina law. S.C.Code Ann. § 17-552 (Supp. 1971) ; 1 State v. Hill, 254 S.C. 321, 175 S.E.2d 227, 232 (1970). The sentencing judge was doubtless influenced, and properly so, by Wood’s prior criminal record. 2

Whatever may be our subjective view of the matter, we fail to discern here objective factors establishing dispropor-tionality in violation of the eighth amendment. See Hart v. Coiner, 483 F. 2d 136 (4th Cir. 1973), decided today.

The decision of the district court will therefore be

Affirmed.