Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1974

United States v. Boone

United States v. Boone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 16, 1974 · Field, Haynsworth, Winter
499 F.2d 551 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Brian P. Gettings, U. S. Atty., David G. Lowe and Dennis H. Dohnal, Asst. U. S. Attys., on brief, for appellant., Murray J. Janus, Edward D. Barnes, Matthew N. Ott, Jr., Richmond, Va., James W. Renney, Wakefield, Va., C. Hardaway Marks, Hopewell, Va., C. Willard Norwood, Richmond, Va., J. Claiborne Dance, Richard L. Jones, Peters-burg, Va. [Court-appointed counsel], William Earle White, Jr., Andrew W. Wood, Richmond, Va. [Court-appointed counsel], James G. Harrison, Hopewell, Va. [Court-appointed counsel], Robert L. Harris, R. R. Ryder, Joseph S. Bambacus and R. Carter Scott, III, Richmond, Va., on brief, for appellees.

United States v. Boone

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision. The 3 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented by these appeals were specifically resolved adversely to the Defendants! position by the Supreme Court in United States v. Giordano et al., 416 U.S. 505, 94 S.Ct. 1820, 40 L.Ed.2d 341 (1974) and United States v. Chavez et al., 416 U.S. 562, 94 S.Ct. 1849, 40 L.Ed.2d 380 (1974). The orders of the district court 348 F.Supp. 168 granting the Defendants’ motions to suppress are, therefore, reversed and the cases are remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.