Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad
Opinion of the Court
The Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) instituted this action pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 1(20) against the defend
Following a hearing the district judge filed an opinion containing his findings of fact and conclusions of law in which he held that B & A's failure to provide rail service on the segment in question constituted an unlawful abandonment within the meaning of Section 1(18) and granted injunctive relief requiring B & A to proceed with the repairs necessary to restore such rail service. With respect to Alco’s claim for damages, the district judge concluded that its pursuit of damages in the Commission proceeding constituted an election of remedies under 49 U.S.C. § 9, precluding its assertion of damages in the district court.
Upon consideration of the record, the briefs and oral argument, we affirm upon the opinion of the district judge. I.C.C. v. Baltimore and Annapolis Railroad Company, 398 F.Supp. 454 (D.C.Md. 1975).
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and Alco-Gravure, Inc. v. The BALTIMORE AND ANNAPOLIS RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, and Elmer J. Jubb, Appellees INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and Alco-Gravure, Inc. v. The BALTIMORE AND ANNAPOLIS RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, and Elmer J. Jubb, (two cases)
- Status
- Published