U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1984

Wilson v. Ferrell

Wilson v. Ferrell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 13, 1984 · Ervin, Murnaghan, Widener
738 F.2d 637 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

James L. Mann, II, Columbia, S.C. (Mann & Rickborn, Columbia, S.C., James M. Shoemaker, Jr., Frank S. Holleman, III, Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellants,, Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., Greenville, S.C. (Theo W. Mitchell, Mitchell, Smith & Pauling, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellees.

Wilson v. Ferrell

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Upon further consideration of the facts, issues, and course of proceedings to date in this action, we are of opinion that permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) was improvidently granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.*

We have been advised that the claims of the Wilsons against appellants Accomondo and O’Neill have been settled, but do not act on their motion for dismissal under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) because the entire appeal has been dismissed. The parties should notify the district court of their settlement agreement for entry of an appropriate order in that court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.