U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1986

Lawrence Cranberg v. Richard W. Garnett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 29, 1986

799 F.2d 751; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 29105; 1986 WL 16062 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

799 F.2d 751
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lawrence Cranberg, Appellant,
v.
Richard W. Garnett.

No. 85-1841.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 10, 1986.
Decided Aug. 29, 1986.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (C/A No. 84-0014)

Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

(Lawrence Cranberg, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen D. Rosenfield, MacQueen, Rosenfield & Green; William M. Marshall, Gordon, Marshall & Rutschow, for Appellee.)

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Cranberg v. Garnett, C/A No. 84-0014 (W.D. Va., July 9, 1985).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.