William Scarborough v. Sebastian Valenti (Warden)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit September 16, 1986

William Scarborough v. Sebastian Valenti (Warden), 801 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1986)

1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30743; 1986 WL 17635

Opinion

801 F.2d 394
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William SCARBOROUGH, Appellant,
v.
Sebastian VALENTI (Warden), Appellee.

No. 86-7077.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 19, 1986.
Decided Sept. 16, 1986.

William Scarborough, appellant pro se.

Stephen H. Sachs, Attorney General's Office, and Jillyn K. Schulze, Attorney General's Office, for appellee.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Scarborough v. Valenti, C/A No. Y-84-4387 (D.Md., Jan. 30, 1986).

DISMISSED

Reference

Status: Unpublished