Stockton v. Samberg
Stockton v. Samberg
Opinion
802 F.2d 451
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dennis Walden STOCKTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael C. SAMBERG; Fred E. Jordan, Jr.; Rufus Fleming;
H.D. Seay; B. Lewis; Lt. Hubbard; Gwen Powell; Gwen
Thomas; B. Eggleston; R.D. Grant; Kathi N. King.; Sgt.
Davis, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-6637.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 29, 1986.
Decided Sept. 30, 1986.
Dennis Walden Stockton, appellant pro se.
Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1963 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Stockton v. Samberg, C/A No. 85-984-AM (E.D.Va., May 21, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.