James Christopher Austin v. W.D. Blankenship R.A. Young W.F. Ammonette J.L. Hylton Harold Thompson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
James Christopher Austin v. W.D. Blankenship R.A. Young W.F. Ammonette J.L. Hylton Harold Thompson, 804 F.2d 677 (4th Cir. 1986)
1986 WL 17972

James Christopher Austin v. W.D. Blankenship R.A. Young W.F. Ammonette J.L. Hylton Harold Thompson

Opinion

804 F.2d 677
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Christopher AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.D. BLANKENSHIP; R.A. Young; W.F. Ammonette; J.L.
Hylton; Harold Thompson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-6725.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 14, 1986.
Decided Nov. 4, 1986.

James Christopher Austin, appellant pro se.

Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Austin v. Blankenship, C/A No. 86-249-R (W.D.Va., July 10, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status
Unpublished