Randolph v. Sielaff
Randolph v. Sielaff
Opinion
808 F.2d 835
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Bernard RANDOLPH, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
David Stone; Albert Starks; James Lowther; Albert
Whitten; Roosevelt Painter; Robert Arrington; Gary Camp;
William Hickerson; Michael O'Neill; William Glazebrook;
Silas Cooper; Craig Jackson; Sam L. Basse, David Warren, Plaintiffs,
v.
Allyn R. SIELAFF, Director; Edward W. Murray, Deputy
Director, Defendants- Appellees.
No. 86-7230.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 18, 1986.
Decided Dec. 15, 1986.
Before RUSSELL, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
William Bernard Randolph, III, appellant pro se.
Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Randolph v. Sielaff, C/A 85-0103-L (W.D.Va., July 30, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.