U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1987

Arthur Ellsworth Veach v. Gary L. Bass, James Radcliff, Harold Catron, W.P. Terry, Chester Spruill James Onorich

Arthur Ellsworth Veach v. Gary L. Bass, James Radcliff, Harold Catron, W.P. Terry, Chester Spruill James Onorich
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 10, 1987
812 F.2d 1402; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1942; 1987 WL 267680 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Arthur Ellsworth Veach v. Gary L. Bass, James Radcliff, Harold Catron, W.P. Terry, Chester Spruill James Onorich

Opinion

812 F.2d 1402
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Arthur Ellsworth VEACH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary L. BASS, James Radcliff, Harold Catron, W.P. Terry,
Chester Spruill; James Onorich, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-6648.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 29, 1986.
Decided Feb. 10, 1987

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Veach v. Bass, C/A No. 85-935-AM (E.D.Va., June 11, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.