William Herman Glazebrook v. William P. Rogers, Warden
William Herman Glazebrook v. William P. Rogers, Warden
Opinion
813 F.2d 1227
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Herman GLAZEBROOK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William P. ROGERS, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86-7266.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 29, 1987.
Decided March 6, 1987.
Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
William Herman Glazebrook, appellant pro se.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Glazebrook v. Rogers, C/A 86-976-AM (E.D.Va., Aug. 25, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.